|
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
What makes this process different? |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Here are some of the features that make THE PGI PROMISE very different from a traditional consulting project:
|
Feature |
|
THE PGI PROMISE |
|
Traditional Consulting Project |
Project Scope |
|
Comprehensive
|
|
Addresses the whole company at once |
|
|
|
Addresses all revenue and cost opportunities at the same time |
|
|
Selective
|
|
Focuses on some portion of the company |
|
|
|
Focuses on one specific topic (e.g., a cost issue or a revenue opportunity) |
|
|
|
|
It takes about 100 days to develop the Performance Improvement Actions.
|
|
Projects are sequential and never seem to end.
|
|
|
|
Line managers: “Here is what we suggest to improve our company…” Change comes from within.
|
|
Consultant: “Here is what you should do to improve your company…” Change comes from the outside.
|
|
Project Deliverable
|
|
A Performance Improvement Plan consisting of several hundred clearly defined projects, some big some small, each with real value that are ready to go.
|
|
A “Blue Book” presentation with recommendations. Usually additional work is required to transform the recommendations into concrete projects that middle managers can execute.
|
|
|
|
Implementation is guaranteed. By design THE PGI PROMISE is geared toward implementation. The Executive Team thoroughly discusses every important idea and its “GO-decision” automatically triggers the implementation.
|
|
Implementation is not guaranteed. The project sponsor may or may not decide to implement the recommendation. Corporate history is replete with recommendations that remained “paper-ware” because of internal resistance and unanticipated implementation issues.
|
|
|
|
20% or more of pre-tax earnings.
|
|
Limited by scope and project effectiveness.
|
|
Of the different approaches to improve profits, THE PGI PROMISE has the largest and fastest financial impact on a company.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
